Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
The ethical policy of Stardom Scientific Journals are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and complies with the Stardom Scientific Journal Editorial Board codes of conduct. Readers, authors, reviewers, and editors should follow these ethical policies when working with Stardom Scientific Journals. In addition, the ethical policy of Stardom Scientific Journals determine which typical research papers or articles submitted to the journal should be published in the concerned issue. For information on publishing and ethical guidelines, please visit http://publicationethics.org.
Duties and Responsibilities of Publishers
- Stardom Scientific Journals ensure that editorial decisions on manuscript submissions are final.
- Stardom Scientific Journals make decisions on manuscript submissions based solely on professional judgment and unaffected by commercial interests.
- Stardom Scientific Journals maintain the integrity of academic and research records.
- Stardom Scientific Journals monitor the ethics of all involved parties: Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editors, Editorial Board Members, Reviewers, Authors, and Readers.
- Stardom Scientific Journals check for plagiarism and fraudulent data issues in submitted manuscripts.
- Stardom Scientific Journals are willing to publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions as necessary.
Duties and Responsibilities of Editors
- Editors have the authority to reject/accept a manuscript.
- Editors maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
- The Editor-in-Chief collaborates with other editors and reviewers to decide on submitted manuscripts.
- Editors preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
- Editors disclose and avoid conflicts of interest.
- Editors maintain academic integrity and strive to meet the needs of readers and authors.
- Editors investigate plagiarism and fraudulent data issues and publish necessary corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies.
- Editors limit themselves to the intellectual content and maintain confidentiality.
- Editors do not disclose information about submitted manuscripts without authorization.
- Editors do not use unpublished materials for their own research without consent.
Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers
- Reviewers assist Editors in deciding to publish submitted manuscripts.
- Reviewers maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts they review.
- Reviewers provide timely comments to help editors make decisions.
- Reviewers treat manuscripts confidentially and avoid personal advantage.
- Reviewers’ comments are technical, professional, and objective.
- Reviewers disclose and avoid conflicts of interest.
Duties and Responsibilities of Authors
- Manuscripts must be submitted in English (Arabic allowed for architectural engineering articles) with proper grammar and terminology.
- Authors confirm that manuscripts are not published elsewhere or under consideration by another journal.
- The corresponding author ensures all co-authors approve the manuscript’s publication.
- Authors participate in the peer-review process.
- Authors ensure institutional approval for submitted manuscripts.
- Authors permit editing for readability.
- Authors disclose financial support and describe the role of sponsors.
- Authors allow the corresponding author to review the edited manuscript.
- Authors promptly notify editors of errors in their published work.
- Authors acknowledge that submitted manuscripts are screened for plagiarism.
- Authors ensure all authors review the submission final checklist.
Principles of Transparency
- Peer review process and journal policies are clearly described on the journal’s website.
- Stardom Journal has a recognized editorial board with expertise in engineering subjects.
- Contact information for the editorial office is provided.
- The journal is fully open access with an article publication fee.
- Stardom Journal addresses research misconduct allegations promptly.
- The journal website ensures high ethical and professional standards.
- Stardom Journal’s name is unique and distinguishable.
- Authors disclose conflicts of interest.
- The publishing schedule is clearly indicated.
- Archiving plans for journal content are outlined.
Violation of Publication Ethics
- Stardom Journal prohibits plagiarism, data fabrication/falsification, simultaneous submission, duplicate publication, redundant publications, improper author contribution, and citation manipulation.
- Sanctions for violations include immediate rejection of manuscripts, prohibition against submissions, and retraction of fraudulent articles.
Handling Cases of Misconduct
- Stardom Journal addresses ethical concerns promptly and follows standard practices.
- Initial actions include informing authors and seeking explanations.
- Serious infractions may result in bans on future submissions, notifications to affiliations, and article retractions.
Journal Complaints and Appeals Process
- Stardom Scientific Journals welcome well-evidenced appeals, reviewed by the editorial board.
- Complaints and appeals are handled following COPE guidelines.
- Investigations are conducted, and corrections or retractions are made as necessary.
This statement outlines Stardom Scientific Journals’ commitment to ethical publishing practices, transparency, and integrity in research dissemination.
